Sex selection and the resulting ratio bias
V. Bhaskar, 24 June 2008
Gender bias, in the form of a parental preference for having boys rather than girls, is a phenomenon exhibited in many parts of the world and is reflected in male-biased gender ratios. Modern medicine has aggravated the problem – foetal sex determination, while illegal for selective abortion in China and India, is a flourishing practice and medical developments have been associated with an increase in the sex ratio at birth in South/East Asia from its usual norm of 105-106 boys per 100 girls to 116.9 according to the 2000 Chinese census, and 107.8 in the 2001 Indian census, with much stronger biases recorded in certain regions.
The author of CEPR DP6876 considers a society where parents prefer boys, but also value grandchildren. He finds that parental choice results in a socially inefficient situation – it is estimated, for example, that 40-50 million Chinese men could be without brides. As the marriage market is subject to frictions, the existence of bride prices will not result in an efficient outcome.
He extends his model to consider the effect of China’s one-child policy on the country’s sex ratio and finds that the ratio would be more unbalanced in a two-child society than a one-child society as when parents already have one daughter, the incentive for the second to be a boy is even higher because the promise of a grandchild is there already. The author therefore claims that it is far from clear that China’s one-child policy has been responsible for the increase in the country’s sex ratio bias.
Summarised by CEPR staff
DP6876 Parental Sex Selection and Gender Balance
Journalists are entitled to free DP downloads on request; please contact pressoffice@cepr.org. To learn more about subscribing to CEPR's Discussion Paper Series, please visit the CEPR website.
URL: http://www.cepr.org/pubs/new-dps/dplist.asp?dpno=6876.asp
Topics: Development
Tags: congestion externality, family economics, gender bias, marriage market, sex ratio, sex selection
- Login or register to post comments
- 9345 reads
- Printer-friendly version
Most Read
- The case for 4% inflationBall
- Helicopter money as a policy optionReichlin, Turner, Woodford
- The banking crisis as a giant carry trade gone wrongAcharya, Steffen
- Everything the IMF wanted to know about financial regulation and wasn’t afraid to askBair
- Rethinking macroeconomic policy: Getting granularBlanchard, Dell'Ariccia, Mauro
- A tale of two depressions: What do the new data tell us? February 2010 updateEichengreen, O’Rourke
- Educated in America: College graduates and high school dropoutsHeckman, LaFontaine
- Eurozone breakup would trigger the mother of all financial crisesEichengreen
- Panic-driven austerity in the Eurozone and its implicationsDe Grauwe, Ji
- Debt, deleveraging, and the liquidity trap: A new modelKrugman
Vox Talks
Vox eBooks
Don't Miss
The wisdom of Karlsruhe: The OMT court case should be dismissed
Giavazzi, Portes, Weder di Mauro, Wyplosz
CEPR Policy Research
- The "Greatest" Carry Trade Ever? Understanding Eurozone Bank RisksAcharya, Steffen
- Political Credit Cycles: The Case of the Euro ZoneFernández-Villaverde, Garicano, Santos
- Winning by Losing: Incentive Incompatibility in Multiple QualifiersDagaev, Sonin
- Income and schoolingBrückner, Gradstein
- Monetary Policy and Rational Asset Price BubblesGalí
- How the EZ crisis is permanently changing EU institutionsMicossi
- WTO 2.0: Global governance of supply-chain tradeBaldwin
- Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwindsGordon
- The economic crisis: How to stimulate economies without increasing public debtWood
- Austerity: Too Much of a Good Thing?Corsetti
Events
- Understanding banks in emerging markets5 - 6 September 2013 / EBRD, London / European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and Tilburg University